Is the Internet sales tax a way to get revenue? Of course it is, but...the issues seem to be a little more complex then people would like. Be it known, the Internet tax has been debated for years, but since the "great recession" and than the search for additional revenue by states, the issue is once again in the forefront. This, as you all know, came to a head when California signed into a law that required all online retailing sites to
pay taxes on their affiliate sales, and it brought Amazon into the picture. Whom, as it has done in other states, cut their affiliate programs in the state of California.
Many affiliates in the state lost from 40 to 70% of their revenue. And, because of this lost, some moved their business to friendlier states. If you step back and look at the situation in California, you realized that is was really a lose-lose situation for both Amazon and for California.
Don't think so. In my estimation California would gain Internet sales tax revenue, but instantly lost revenue from the affiliates that did or are doing business in the state. And, if the individuals or small businesses move elsewhere, that is more lost revenue.
Amazon, is losing affiliates from every state that decides to collect revenue from the Internet. Surely they can't be happy about this either. This, I suppose, is why Amazon reached an agreement with California to approach Congress about addressing Internet sales taxes. If not tax solution is found, than California would once again but the tax into place. But in California's and the Amazon affiliate issue, the case is rather mote, since Amazon is planning on putting physical call centers into the state.
When you think about it, this issue is really interesting. Why? States normally impose taxes that are usually local or state wide. In the case of Internet taxes, it's going across state borders and is truly "interstate" in nature. Not, that they can't legally do it, but they can.
Bills in Congress and Senate
There is currently several bills before Congress.
- Before the Senate-Main Street Fairness Act- This bill calls for a set of federal guidelines that would dictate how states could collect sales taxes from online retailers.
- Before the House-Marketplace Equity Act of 2011-This bill is a little different from the Senate. This bill gives states the authority to require retailers, online and offline, the authority to collect sales taxes even if the customers are located in states where the companies have no physical presence.
Bottomline, both bills are trying to find ways to give the states the authority to have a state-based system of taxation on the Internet.
Internet State Options Suggested
There has been suggestions to possible options that can make the Internet tax a little more uniform.
Some have suggested 1) nationwide sales tax in which a certain portion of the income would be given to all the states, or 2) the current idea of taxing consumers at the origin of sale and not at the destination.
The problem I see, is uniformity because overall, local taxes within the states are not uniform. A national tax would bring uniformity. Question is, but would the federal government distribute the revenue to the states?
And as to the current idea of taxing consumers at the origin, if can be a major headache for online retailers if they have to comply with a different tax from each state.
To conclude, states are definitely looking to the Internet to help solve their budget shortfalls, however, I see a little chaos before the calm before it's all said and done.